Highlight Question
Moderator: kfury77
Forum rules
Please try to follow these guidelines. This will help to receive faster and more accurate response.
Please try to follow these guidelines. This will help to receive faster and more accurate response.
- Check the Support section of the corresponding product first. Chances are you will find your answer there;
- Do not create new topics for already reported problems. Add your comments to the existing topics instead;
- Create separate topic for each problem request. Do NOT post a number of non-related problem reports in a single topic;
- Give your topic a meaningful title. Titles such as "A question," "Bug report" and "Help!" provide others no clue what your message is about;
- Include the version number of the software you are using;
- This is not an official customer support helpdesk. If you need a prompt and official response, please contact our support team directly instead. It may take a while until you receive a reply in the forum;
Highlight Question
I would like to ask a question.. in EditPlus, when I enter header( or fopen(... any PHP Function, it is always in bold.. in Rapid PHP, it's not in bold.. so i don't know if it's a function or not.. also, i wanted the default text to be in bold because in regular mode, i can't read it.
Please... make PHP functions higlight inside the code..
Please... make PHP functions higlight inside the code!!!
It's very important to see if you typed correct func. name during coding..
Like Editplus does.
Thanks in advance
It's very important to see if you typed correct func. name during coding..
Like Editplus does.
Thanks in advance
If this is a stupid question, please forgive me, but I can't seem to find this feature anywhere in the current version. I'm in my trial period at the moment, and I'm pretty happy with Rapid PHP so far (I've posted a couple other topics asking about features that appear to be missing), but this one is pretty close to being a deal breaker for me. The ability to see at a glance if you've spelled the function correctly, or if your memory is right (is it str_replace or strreplace?) is very useful and saves a lot of debugging (and reference checking) time.Karlis wrote:Thank you for your suggestions. We will consider them when planning improvements to the function hints.
Am I just missing something somewhere?
Thanks!